Subrata Roy Sahara vs Uoi & Ors on 6 May, 2014
Equivalent citations: AIR 2014
legal heirs had illegally/ fraudulently settled their alleged shares under two divergent release deeds in favour of one M.Ramesh, wife of late ... seeking the District Registrar to legally efface the said release deeds and sale deeds.
10.The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the sale
selling the said property. The two agricultural loans were, thus,
settled. However, on seeking release of title deeds of the other
WP(C).Nos.7843 ... release of the two title deeds with
respect to the two properties, mortgaged as against the two
agricultural loans, which admittedly is satisfied. The general
two sale deeds are
concerned, learned counsel for defendant/applicant could not
explain as to how he came to know about these two sale deeds ... application that release
deed was executed in favour of Smt. Savitri Devi who executed
sale deed in favour of defendant-applicant. Two sale deeds
were
released all rights in the immovable
properties fallen to the share of her husband
late Narayanappa under a release deed dated ... two documents upon which defendants
5 to 7 place reliance to prove partition of the year 1960
are Ex.P19 the unregistered release deed
Veereswaram Village, SrirangamTaluk on
03.11.1894. Two of the trustees appointed by Chellathammal executed released
deed and one of the trustees by name Krishanapattar had died
first defendant and his two sisters became entitled to 1/3 share each and that by virtue of a Release Deed dated 24.12.1957 executed ... those two sisters of the first defendant released their 2/3 share in favour of the first defendant by executing a registered Release Deed dated
Veereswaram Village, SrirangamTaluk on
03.11.1894. Two of the trustees appointed by Chellathammal executed released
deed and one of the trustees by name Krishanapattar had died
prove that the registered
release deed dated 10.06.1966 came into
existence only to avoid legal claim by the
first two wives of Kabbalegowda, when ... that Kabbalegowda executed the
said registered release deed dated
10.06.1966 to avoid legal claim by his first
two wives?
(ii) Whether the Court
adverse claim that by a registered release
deed, the plaintiff and the defendants 1 to 3 have released and relinquished
of the property in favour ... registered release deed in
terms of Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, as contended by the
learned counsel for the appellant for two reasons