Astrazeneca Uk Ltd. And Anr. vs Orchid Chemicals And Pharmaceuticals ... on 16 May, 2006
Equivalent citations: 2006(32)PTC733(DEL)
Author: Anil Kumar
Bench: Anil
articles are concerned in the
authorities emanating from US and some in UK, the same should be
followed as such in Indian law overlooking ... Lexis Nexis also provides for the
legislative history of Designs Act in UK which also supports the same view
that the monopoly conferred by Designs
totally out of
context............."
11. Considerable reliance was placed on Astrazeneca UK Ltd. and Anr.
v. Orchid Chemicals and Pharmceuticals ... Appellate Board.
13. The above ruling of the Single Judge, in Astrazeneca UK Ltd. (supra)
was affirmed by the Division Bench in Astrazeneca UK
Cadbury Uk Limited & Anr. vs Lotte India Corporation Ltd. on 24 January, 2014
Author: S. Muralidhar
Bench: S. Muralidhar
IN THE HIGH COURT ... Reserved on: January 8, 2014
Decision on: January 24, 2014
CADBURY UK LIMITED & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs
Through: Mr. C.M. Lall, Ms. Ekta Sarin
well, inasmuch as ESPL
has threatened to invoke the jurisdiction of the UK Courts
invoking the UK laws.
8. In MacShannon, the House of Lords ... jurisdiction
fao(os)107.2010 & 154.2010 Page 15 of 67
of the UK Court. It is contended that the question of forum non
conveniens
Services (Uk) Limited vs Union Of India & Anr. on 21 November, 2011
Author: S. Muralidhar
Bench: S. Muralidhar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ... Date of order: November 21, 2011
VF SERVICES (UK) LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Senior
Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Mr. J.
Sivanandaraaj
Everyone Wants and M/s. Glossy Fashion Ltd., both of United Kingdom (UK) on the basis of fake and forged five particular export certificates issued ... Quantity/
Value
1. INGB-524 06624 M/s. Kapil M/s. Hamlet UK/6/5 Pcs
dt. 22.4.95 Products International 10 Pounds
PLC, London
that the owner of a special copyright, under Section 19 (of the UK Act), in a
record had the sole right to use the record ... Clause 13- This clause roughly corresponds to Section 1(1) of the UK Act and describes
the works in which Copyright shall subsist. It provides
view of considerable difference between Sections 16, 19 and 20
of UK Copyrights, Patents and Designs Act, 1988 and the
provisions of Indian Copyright ... ratio of the judgments of
UK courts relied upon by IPRS cannot be applied in the present
case; (iii) in view of the fact that
agencies of three
countries -- to begin with in Belgium and UK and concluding in India.
Most of the material witnesses being foreign witnesses (there being ... Belgium witnesses and 24 UK witnesses), the investigation in Belgium and
UK having been conducted according to the law and procedure of those
countries
