Usha Verma @ Gudiya vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 January, 2022
1
The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
MCRC ... USHA VERMA @ GUDIYA Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
Jabalpur, Dated : 14-01-2022
Heard through Video Conferencing.
Shri L.C. Chourasiya, Advocate for the applicant
Usha Verma @ Usha Kumari vs The State Of Bihar on 9 December, 2020
Author: Prabhat Kumar Singh
Bench: Prabhat Kumar Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT ... Year-2020 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East
Champaran
======================================================
1. USHA VERMA @ USHA KUMARI W/o Late Shardanand Prasad R/o
Mohalla- Belbanwa, Ward
Naveen Kumar forcibly snatched away the golden
neck chain of complainant Usha Verma and fled away.
Accordingly, an FIR was registered against unknown accused
persons ... complainant Usha Verma who stated that on 16.10.1996,
at 12.45 P.M., she was returning from Laxmi Nagar along with her
friend Seema, when they
City, District
Mansa alongwith all consequential proceedings qua petitioners Vishal
Verma, Jiwan Verma and Usha Verma is, hereby, quashed.
( RAM CHAND GUPTA )
October
been falsely implicated in the
present case.
18. PW-7 WSI Usha Verma who is a formal witness was
examined on 06.04.2009 and proved ... MHCM who deposited the case property in
Malkhana. PW-7 WSI Usha Verma has been examined as duty officer who
registered the said FIR which
Witness
correctly identified the accused persons.
6. PW2 is ASI Usha Verma, Duty Officer, who registered the present FIR.
7. PW3 is Krishan Kumar Verma
opportunities given.
12. PW-4 ASI Usha Verma who is a formal witness was examined
on 24.03.2003 and proved the copy of FIR vide
complainant Ranjana
Verma in CAW cell against her in laws namely Prahlad Verma (husband), Sharda
(mother in law), Suresh (Jeth), Usha Rani (Jethani) and Anita ... 2007 State vs. Suresh Verma & Ors. Page number 5 of 5
upon the accused persons Prahlad Verma and Usha Rani
sentenced to life imprisonment by Sri Usha Kant Verma, the then IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur in S.T. No. 282 of 1979. Aggrieved
examined Virendra Verma (PW-1), Amit
Kumar Jha (PW-12) and Rahul Yadav (PW-13) as eyewitnesses of the
incident. Virendra Verma and Amit Kumar ... support the prosecution case. Though the facts
narrated by Virendra Verma to Rajkumar and Usha Rani Yadav
cannot be accepted as admissible part of evidence
