letter with his opinion and
thereafter, the third report of 'unsafe sample and exceed the
melamine contents' was received. The offence under ... Rules, 2011. After collecting the sample of
the requisite quantity, the Officer collecting such sample has to
divide such sample into four parts
prima facie sample described in both reports is distinct.
However, both reports denote that both samples were unsafe under
the provisions of the FSSI ... sample. Even
11 of 18
(12) 922criwp236.25.odt
assuming that both samples were sent differently. However, both
samples report indicates that both were unsafe
permitted under Regulation 2 .7.2 (Appendix A). Hence sample
is unsafe under Section ... amount of colouring matter in the sample. It is stated that
considering the report of the three samples of the same batch/lot the
department
obtained cross-signature of accused no.1 on
each part of sample in such a way that part of signature will
appear on brown paper ... report was received on 16.10.2012. According to
the complaint, the sample is unsafe under Section 3 (1) (zz) (ix)
of the said Act. The necessary
sample is found to be
safe, the remaining sample is required to be returned to the importer.
If the sample is found to be unsafe ... sample sent
to the Food Analyst is found to be unsafe that such second sample be
referred to the Referral Laboratory. The communication
dated
January 2014
to the effect that the cow milk sample sent to it was "unsafe" as per Section ... render the article of food unsafe;"
"3(1)(zz) "unsafe food" means an article of food whose
nature, substance or quality
recovered from the
accused or from the witnesses. DNA testing
on samples such as saliva, skin, blood, hair or
semen not only helps to convict ... there is evidence to show tampering of the
samples, the DNA test report would be unsafe to be made a
basis for convicting the accused
recovered from the
accused or from the witnesses. DNA testing
on samples such as saliva, skin, blood, hair or
semen not only helps to convict ... there is evidence to show tampering of the
samples, the DNA test report would be unsafe to be made a
basis for convicting the accused
recovered from the
accused or from the witnesses. DNA testing
on samples such as saliva, skin, blood, hair or
semen not only helps to convict ... there is evidence to show tampering of the
samples, the DNA test report would be unsafe to be made a
basis for convicting the accused
recovered from the
accused or from the witnesses. DNA testing
on samples such as saliva, skin, blood, hair or
semen not only helps to convict ... there is evidence to show tampering of the
samples, the DNA test report would be unsafe to be made a
basis for convicting the accused