stayed the demand notices.
8. It appears that in the meantime, the sample of the
weak spirit was sent for chemical examination to the
Chemical ... Chemical Examiner
dated 12th August, 1999, the sample was found unfit and
unsafe for human consumption.
9. Two more demand notices dated 12th March
place located close to the
Temple. Two out of the four samples failed to meet the minimum
standards. Subsequent to price negotiations with the remaining ... dated 05.01.2023 termed the product as ‘unsafe’.
Further, the High Court through its order dated 06.01.2023
directed the samples to be sent to the FSSAI
reason for which we feel it unsafe to accept the evidence led in this regard is that the sample foot prints were not taken before
Gastrade International vs Commissioner Of Customs, Kandla on 28 March, 2025
Author: Surya Kant
Bench
there are some other
circumstances which, when taken together, make it
very unsafe to uphold the appellant's conviction.
10. The seizure ... made on March 8, 2005, at
11:45 in the evening. The samples taken from the
seized substance were sent to FSL on March
view of the
two contradictory reports of chemical analysis of the sample of vaginal
swab and smear (Ext. P-2 and P-9), the benefit ... accused. In this regard, it has been submitted that the sample in
respect of which Ext. P-2 report was submitted was taken
this case. As already stated the
Public Analyst has found in the sample only nine living meal
worms and he has neither stated that ... overrun or spread in large numbers so as to be unpleasant or
unsafe".
468
In Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Kacheroo
handwriting expert. He opined on comparison of the sample handwritings of Sobhraj, handwriting of the person who had checked in at Hotel Nataraj ... person. He further opined that the words and figures appearing in the sample writings tallied with the two writings obtained from Nataraj Hotel and Varanasi
view
that upon the material placed on record it would be
unsafe to convict the appellants. They are certainly
entitled to the benefit of doubt ... there are some other
circumstances which, when taken together, make it
very unsafe to uphold the appellant’s conviction.
10. The seizure of the alleged
first place, it was submitted that so far as the sample taken from the house of the Lawyer P.W. 2 is concerned no conviction ... purchased from the appellant on 1.10.1970 to the time when the sample was taken by the Food Inspector on 5.10.1970. In our opinion, this contention
