sample was analyzed by food analyst and vide his report
no. FSS/394/2019 dated 29.03.2019, food analyst opined that the sample is
unsafe because ... certificate no. 224/May/19-ND dated 08.05.2019
reported that the sample was unsafe as defined under Section
sample to any accredited laboratory for testing, but
accused/FBO did not opt for the sample and therefore one
counterpart sample was sent to Food ... Prakash
3. Food Analyst analysed the sample and found the sample to be
unsafe. The report of Public Analyst is as follows:
"The sample
Vide report dated 23.08.2016, the Food Analyst found the sample to
be unsafe because it was coloured with unpermitted oil soluble
synthetic colouring matter ... findings in the Director, RFL report as per which
the sample is unsafe and does not conform to the general
provisions of a Food Article
fact, what comes to the fore from
the record is that the sample was lifted from the business premises of
the respondent ... sample to
laboratory at Kolkata for re-analysis. Ultimately, the report dated
17.02.2015 was received from the said laboratory terming the sample
as 'unsafe
Food Analyst who vide his report dated 30.4.2015 found the sample to be Kheshari Sabut and opined that the same is kheshari dal which ... regulation 2.2.1. It is not fit for human consumption. Hence the sample is unsafe.
5. A short argument has been raised by learned counsel
samples and forwarded the same to the
Food Analyst Lab, Salem. Report, dated 4/4/2014 of the analyst shows that
the sample is Unsafe
10908 of 2022
(Packer), Madurai, for selling unsafe rice bran oil and also for selling
misleading, misbranded, substandard, prohibited and restricted food,
jointly prosecuted ... same
for analysis. After obtaining the report, which states that the sample is
unsafe, the respondent prosecuted the transport owner and the
Accountant. They
10900 of 2022
(Packer), Madurai, for selling unsafe oil and also for selling misleading,
misbranded, substandard, prohibited and restricted food, jointly
prosecuted the Accountant ... same for
analysis. After obtaining the report, which states that the sample is
unsafe, the respondent prosecuted the transport owner and the
Accountant. They
accused/M/s.Vaanmathi Oil Store (Packer), Madurai, for selling unsafe
rice bran oil and also for selling misleading, misbranded, substandard,
prohibited and restricted food ... same for analysis. After
obtaining the report, which states that the sample is unsafe, the
respondent prosecuted the transport owner and the Accountant. They
case of the prosecution that the respondent took samples in
four packets, each containing 250 grams and sent for analysis. Report was
received ... going to be used for
adulteration of tea. Hence the sample was unsafe and misbranded, as per
Sections 59 (i) and 52 (1) of Food
