letter with his opinion and
thereafter, the third report of 'unsafe sample and exceed the
melamine contents' was received. The offence under ... Rules, 2011. After collecting the sample of
the requisite quantity, the Officer collecting such sample has to
divide such sample into four parts
sample through the Referral Food
Laboratory, Ghaziabad from where a report dated 10.09.2012 was
received regarding the sample being unsafe. The Food Safety
Officer thereafter ... Ghaziabad dated 10.09.2012, on which date the fact regarding the
food sample being unsafe was affirmed then also, the complaint
had to be filed within
sending the sample for Referral Lab. The
Referral Lab after analyzing, sent a report as the sample was 'unsafe'.
Hence, the Food Safety ... send the sample to the Referral Lab. The Referral Lab sent the report on
09.12.2019 stating that the sample is 'unsafe'. Hence
sample of abovesaid food article
for analysis. The sample was then lifted as per procedure
prescribed under the Act and Rules.
2. The sample ... 2016 dated 08.12.2016, food analyst opined that
the sample is unsafe because of the presence of unpermitted
colouring matter viz. 'Tartrazine, sunset yellow
Manoj Dua & Ors Page No. 4 of 23
the sample is unsafe because it is coloured with synthetic colouring
matter viz. Sunset Yellow ... vide certificate no. 289F/FSSA/2015 dated 05.01.2016
reported that the sample was unsafe as defined under Section 3(1)(zz)
(viii
sample was analyzed by food analyst and vide his report
no. FSS/1116/2020 dated 23.09.2020, food analyst opined that the sample is
unsafe ... report Ex.PW2/C as per
which, the sample was unsafe due to presence of live and dead insects in the
sampled food article
sample was analyzed by food analyst and vide his report
no. FSS/786/2014 dated 10.09.2014, food analyst opined that the sample is
unsafe because ... because the sample contained 10.81% of
discoloured units.
22. As per the RFL report dated 28.10.2014 the food sample was
found unsafe as the same
sample was analyzed by food analyst and vide his report
no. FSS/394/2019 dated 29.03.2019, food analyst opined that the sample is
unsafe because ... certificate no. 224/May/19-ND dated 08.05.2019
reported that the sample was unsafe as defined under Section
sample of
abovesaid food article for analysis. The sample was then lifted as per
procedure prescribed under the Act and Rules. Each sample was separately ... sample was analyzed by food analyst and vide his report
no. NR 72/2016 dated 05.12.2016, food analyst opined that the sample is
unsafe because
Food Analyst
sent a report stating that samples are unsafe and
misbranded. The report is, dated 18/01/2018. He has also
informed about ... permissible limit.
Further, the sample exceeded the prescribed limits of
Aerobio microbial count. So, this comes under the category
of unsafe food. Such a nature
