Gangadhar vs Mysore Urban Development Authority on 31 May, 2013
Equivalent citations: 2013 (4) AKR 366
Author: H N Nagamohan Das
Bench: H.N. Nagamohan ... BHAGWAT & D PAVANESH & LOKESH M)
AND
1.MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
MYSORE
2.STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN
Gian Inder Sharma vs Haryana Urban Development Authority ... on 11 November, 2002
Equivalent citations: (2003)133PLR140, AIR 2003 PUNJAB AND HARYANA 128, (2003) 1 RECCIVR ... question on account of enhanced compensation paid by the Haryana Urban Development Authority.
2. The brief facts of the case are that a residential plot
Bangalore Urban District - 560 058. ...PETITIONERS
(By Shri. A. Nagarajappa, Advocate)
AND:
1. The State of Karnataka,
Represented by its Secretary,
Urban Development Authority ... Commissioner,
Bangalore Development Authority
(BDA), Bangalore.
3. Special Deputy Commissioner,
Bangalore Development Authority
(B.D.A.) Bangalore.
4. Deputy Commissioner,
Bangalore Urban District,
Bangalore
NISHANTH A. V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
VIKASA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ... PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
2. THE TUMKUR CITY
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 003
2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
MANGALORE DISTRICT
MANGALORE ... NISHANTH A.V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
URBAN SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE
expressing any opinion as to whether
it is open for the Urban Development Department to take any such
reservation or not thereby reducing the number ... contempt petition with a direction to the
Secretary, Housing & Urban Development Department and Secretary,
Finance Department to take a decision and implement the same
Brijeshwar Singh vs Haryana Urban Development Authority on 5 September, 2012
Author: L. N. Mittal
Bench: L. N. Mittal ... Date of Decision : September 05, 2012
Brijeshwar Singh .... Petitioner
Vs.
Haryana Urban development Authority .... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
* * *
Present
State of Karnataka,
Rep. by its Secretary,
Ministry of Urban Development,
Vikasa Soudha, Bengaluru - 560 001.
4. Smt. Kavita Sanil,
W/o Arun,
Aged major ... Manmohan P.N., Advocate)
And:
1. State of Karnataka,
Department of Urban Development,
M.S. Building,
Bengaluru - 560 001,
Represented by its
Principal Secretary
Tahasildar
Mysore Taluk,
Mysore - 570 001.
4. The Mysore Urban Development Authority
Mysore - 570 001.
By its Commissioner. ... Respondents
(By Sri. Dhyan Chinnappa, Additional Advocate ... Tahasildar
Mysore Taluk,
Mysore - 570 001.
4. The Mysore Urban Development Authority
Mysore - 570 001.
By its Commissioner. ... Respondents
(By Sri. Dhyan Chinnappa, Additional Advocate
BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR,
BENGALURU - 560 002.
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU ... free of cost to the ULB's (Municipal Body, Urban
Improvement Trust, Urban Development
Authority), required to be set apart for public
purpose
