third respondent, the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (Inv. Circle-2). Vishakhapatnam, has no jurisdiction to take any action in regard to the petitioner ... file No. PAN V-2, Vishakhapatnam. The first respondent is the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Administration, Bombay, and the second responded is the Assistant
trouble. The vessel was required to be towed from sand-
heads to Vishakhapatnam as repairs could not be undertaken
at sand-heads. The plaintiff ... that the cargo
was intact even after the ship was towed to Vishakhapatnam
showed that no sea water entered the ship and, therefore,
the loss
Simplex Castings Ltd. vs Commr. Of Cus., Vishakhapatnam on 2 April, 2003
Equivalent citations: 2003(155)ELT5(SC), 2004(2)SCALE534, (2003)5SCC528, AIRONLINE
Aruna Industries Vishakhapatnam And ... vs Collector Of Central Excise And Ors. on 21 May, 1986
Equivalent citations: 1986(9)ECC35, 1986(8)ECR165(TRI.-DELHI
whether the detention of the petitioner in the Central Jail, Vishakhapatnam, is illegal. One of the grounds for challenging the legality of the said detention ... from complying with the warrant for production issued by the Special Magistrate, Vishakhapatnam and was not entitled to send the petitioner to the Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of CIT v. Vishakhapatnam Port Trust 144 ITR 146 (AP). By an order dated 12.7.2004, the Assessing Officer ... therefore taking shelter of decision of A.P. High Court in Vishakhapatnam Port Trust (supra) by the assessee is not warranted; that to compensate
Commnr. Of Customs, Vishakhapatnam vs M/S. Aggarwal Industries Ltd on 17 October, 2011
Equivalent citations ... APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2521 OF 2006
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, -- APPELLANT
VISHAKHAPATNAM
VERSUS
M/S AGGARWAL INDUSTRIES LTD. -- RESPONDENT
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL
interest;
(3) Reliance on the decisions in the case of CIT v. Vishakhapatnam Port Trust ( 1993) 144 ITR 146 (AP), CIT v. Saurashtra Cement ... purchase price was rejected.
3.2 (3) As regards the case of Vishakhapatnam Port Trust (supra), assessing officer distinguished it on the ground that in that
investigation, the Petitioner along
with Constable Mohd. Aslam travelled to
Vishakhapatnam during the period from 23.05.2001 till
26.05.2001. At Vishakhapatnam, the Petitioner stayed
at Hotel ... latter, of availing
pecuniary advantage from the NGO, during his visit to
Vishakhapatnam from 23.05.2001 till 26.05.2001.
Upon the conclusion of the Preliminary Enquiry
detention order as he had surrendered before a
Court at Vishakhapatnam on 9th September, 2019 and this
information was immediately conveyed to DRI, Detaining
Authority ... read with
Section 34 of Indian Penal Code at Vishakhapatnam and he chose to
W.P.(Crl.) No.780/2020 Page 4 of 44
surrender
