GROUP c"i::.Mr=1,ow§;1::
0;: TALUK VPf_\_fii.CHA"AT
.. . _ _ YELBURGA, DIS'I'.KOPPAL
__MA.?.iA--!§Ei)AjVA
GROUP c"i::.Mr=1,ow§;1::
0;: TALUK VPf_\_fii.CHA"AT
.. . _ _ YELBURGA, DIS'I'.KOPPAL
__MA.?.iA--!§Ei)AjVA
GROUP c"i::.Mr=1,ow§;1::
0;: TALUK VPf_\_fii.CHA"AT
.. . _ _ YELBURGA, DIS'I'.KOPPAL
__MA.?.iA--!§Ei)AjVA
GROUP c"i::.Mr=1,ow§;1::
0;: TALUK VPf_\_fii.CHA"AT
.. . _ _ YELBURGA, DIS'I'.KOPPAL
__MA.?.iA--!§Ei)AjVA
with
interest at 8.5% in order to ascertain PF & VPF payable to the
petitioner upon reopening of housing loan and pension option
being given
IAVING"REGISTERE-D"0'FFICE AT NAGDA,
I MADHYA_VPF!.AD-ESH.'«H"A\fING ITS UNIT
rtiejs in " '
question.
8. Whether the petitioners? 'Vpf¢l).[j'ertE\\uS.y,,fa.:li,'l'o_i1tside
been shown as deduction
under the head of "GPF/VPF Sub". It is argued that such deduction may have
been mostly voluntary
defendants petitior1«Vsee1dcing dir_eCti,on ._
Court below for disposal VOf._Vpf"IA.No..4 in t' V
OS.No.2987/2010
case for irlterference i1j1m_exe'1'eise-«Vpf
jurisdiction under Article 227 of the
particularly for varyirlg an ' i;1:_ few-wjiur