Sri Ram And Ors. vs Chandeshwar Prasad Narayan Singh on 22 April, 1952
take a mere life estate in the office with the remainder vested 'in praesenti' in the next taker, but as a matter
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 129 (0.65 seconds)Gauri Shanker Sah And Ors. vs Ramchander Sah And Ors. on 18 April, 1969
whether she had merely a life interest with the absolute remainder vesting in her male issues. The original will was in Canarese language. The learned ... dominant intention of the testatrix was to confer a permanent and absolute remainder on the male issue of the daughter of the testatrix after
Kedar Nath Ambasta vs Radha Shyam And Ors. on 6 December, 1949
suggest that the sons or their representatives have a vested remainder in this share. According to him, therefore, the test for deciding how the share
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bihar And ... vs Srimati Chandramoni Pattamahadevi ... on 9 January, 1946
which had been left in her possession as well as the vested remainder in the portion of the estate in which Rajendramoni had a life
Hridya Nand Pandey vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 September, 2011
life estate under the settlement deed
executed by his wife conferring vested
remainder in the respondent and on its basis
the respondent was declared entitled
Nihar Ganguli And Ors. vs Rai Anath Nath Basu And Ors. on 4 January, 1956
right of filing a claim under Section 14 , with respect to the vested estates and to prosecute the suit or execution proceeding exclusively in civil ... mortgaged property which was still the property of the mortgagor, the remainder having vested in the State of Bihar under the Land Reforms Act . That
Musammat Janak Kishori Kuer vs Debi Prasad Singh And Ors. on 15 March, 1917
words the effect of the document was to give a vested reversion or remainder to Deo Narain. After some argument this position was abandoned ... compromise or otherwise, to confer upon Deo Narain a vested reversion or remainder in the estate of Kamesher. The position was this.
6. Deo Narain
Jitendra Pratap Bahadur Sahi vs Bhagwati Prasad Singh on 16 April, 1956
life, the result is that an estate in fee in remainder whether vested or contingent must exist in some one.
In the case of Bhagabati ... disposal. The estate vests in her, and so long as she is alive, no one can assert any vested interest in the estate
Brijnandan Singh vs Jamuna Prasad Sahu And Anr. on 14 January, 1958
deemed to be obliterated as a result of the order of vesting.
In reply to the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the respondents ... have at any time, whether in possession, remainder or reversion; and vested or contingent. Possession is thus a concept which may be either a case
Baij Nath Kedia And Anr. vs State Of Bihar And Ors. on 1 November, 1966
writ application. After the vesting of the estate in the State of Bihar, the State became the lessor for the remainder of the term ... vesting was to be "deemed to have been leased by the State Government to the holder of the said subsisting lease for the remainder