suit property for life in favour of Deivayanai Ammal and vested remainder absolutely in favour of the plaintiff and defendants 2 to 6. According ... life interest to Deivayanai Ammal as claimed by the plaintiff, absolute vested remainder in favour of the plaintiff and the defendants
given in favour of his only son by name, Dharmalingam and vested remainder should go to his grandsons, namely, the defendants ... been given to his only son by name, Dharmalingam and vested remainder should go to his grandsons, namely, defendants 1 to 3 and in respect
second
respondent's children were entitled to inherit the vested
remainder?
4. Whether the claim of the plaintiffs/first and
second respondents that
giving a life estate and vested remainder to their respective legal heirs.
The first defendant admittedly, died on 09.06.2010 and therefore, the only
question that
property, have to enjoy the properties for their life time and vested remainder thereon are to be passed on to the male heirs
mother in her favour on 17.01.1974. The plaintiffs who are entitled to vested reminder alone cannot, even during the life time of the first defendant ... suit property. The plaintiffs are the persons having only a vested remainder and their right over the property will ensure only after the death
daughters of Kannammal, have filed the suit seeking to declare their vested remainder right under Ex.A3 Will dated 07.06.1990. This
life estate has been given in favour of his wife and vested remainder should go to his male heirs.
10.It is an admitted fact
right acquired under a settlement deed, in the absence of the vested remainder holder is valid and could convey good title?
(2)Whether the Courts
herself a life interest in the property and vested the
CS (OS) 1161/2015 Page 14
remainder in favour of her second daughter
