mind by
conveying vested right in her favour and she retained the possession during
her lifetime and she created vested remainder rights in favour ... plaintiff keeping life interest in favour of defendant
No. 1 and vested remainder in favour of the plaintiff having with a specific oral
understanding that
estate in favour of his
second wife - Tara Devi and leaving vested remainder to the Plaintiff and
the first Defendant. Hence, after the demise ... interest over the suit
property to Tara Devi and leaving the vested remainder for the plaintiff
and first defendant. Even according to the plaintiff
property was allotted to plaintiff’s share for life estate with vested
remainder to 3rd defendant. The first floor of the suit property was allotted ... allotted to plaintiff and she was given life estate with vested
remainder to her son-3rd defendant. In such circumstances, the defendants
life estate. The plaintiffs too,
were granted life estates and the vested remainder was given to the
grandsons of M.Basavaraj
schedule properties are movable properties
and as both the vested remainder holders died, Narayanamma being a Class-I
heir became the absolute owner ... VGKR,J
A.S.Nos.804 and 820 of 2002
the vested remainder rights were given to Madhavarao, Tammi Naidu and to
their male progeny
schedule properties are movable properties
and as both the vested remainder holders died, Narayanamma being a Class-I
heir became the absolute owner ... VGKR,J
A.S.Nos.804 and 820 of 2002
the vested remainder rights were given to Madhavarao, Tammi Naidu and to
their male progeny
schedule properties are movable properties
and as both the vested remainder holders died, Narayanamma being a Class-I
heir became the absolute owner ... VGKR,J
A.S.Nos.804 and 820 of 2002
the vested remainder rights were given to Madhavarao, Tammi Naidu and to
their male progeny
schedule properties are movable properties
and as both the vested remainder holders died, Narayanamma being a Class-I
heir became the absolute owner ... VGKR,J
A.S.Nos.804 and 820 of 2002
the vested remainder rights were given to Madhavarao, Tammi Naidu and to
their male progeny
suit
properties in favour of the plaintiffs’ father-Ranganathan Gramani with
vested remainder to the plaintiffs. The said Mangammal died on 10.01.1980.
The father ... plaintiffs-Ranganathan Gramani died in the year 1993.
Thereafter, as a vested remainder holder, the plaintiffs got the properties
absolutely. On 31.07.2007, the plaintiffs effected
gift. Under the said document, Padmavathy was granted life interest with
vested remainder to her decedents. Thus, the plaintiff claimed 1/3 share
