procedures. In the United States Supreme Court ruled that consideration of Victim Impact Statements during sentence hearing was Constitutionally permissible (Payne v. Tennessee ... enabled victims to describe the extent of any physical, emotional, or psychological effects caused by the crime. Eventually in U. S., Victim Impact Statements became
disposed
to accept the contention that omission in the first statement of the
informant is fatal to the case. We are disposed to think ... materials brought on record and objective weighing of the
circumstances. The impact of the omission, as is discernible from the
authorities, has to be adjudged
disposed to accept the contention that omission in the first statement
of the informant is fatal to the case. We are disposed to think ... materials brought on record and objective weighing of
the circumstances. The impact of the omission, as is discernible from
the authorities, has to be adjudged
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017
Equivalent citations: AIR 2017
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai ... vs The State Of Gujarat on 4 October, 2017
Equivalent citations: AIR
Ash Mohammad vs Shiv Raj Singh @ Lalla Babu & Anr on 20 September, 2012
Equivalent
State Of Maharashtra Trhu Cbi vs Vikram Anantrai Doshi & Ors on 19 September, 2014
Navtej Singh Johar vs Union Of India Ministry Of Law And ... on 6 September, 2018
Shakti Vahini vs Union Of India on 27 March, 2018
Equivalent citations: AIR 2018 SUPREME
Mangla Ram vs The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd on 6 April, 2018
Equivalent citations: AIR
