illegal termination from service. It was further alleged that the
respondent was victimising the petitioner, as he had acted as a
whistleblower against the respondent ... petitioner, that he had been illegally terminated. The allegations of
malafide and victimisation, as levelled by the petitioner against the
respondent were also, needless
salutary safeguard which the legislature has provided for
their protection against victimisation. In the second place,
and apart from the first grievance which ... satisfied that the allegations, if
any, about want of good faith or victimisation or unfair
labour practice were baseless. The Tribunal would also
have
these
adjudicating authorities because of the prevalence of unfair
labour practice or victimisation by the management. Even so,
the power under Section ... available to be exercised, even
if there be no victimisation or taking recourse to unfair labour
practice. In this background, I do not think
even today the actions of the State Governments are aimed at his
victimisation. We are constrained to come to this finding for more than
terminated illegally
and/or mala fide and/or by way of victimisation, unfair labour
practice, etc. However, when it comes to the case of termination
terminated illegally and/or mala fide and/or by way of
victimisation, unfair labour practice, etc. However, when it
comes to the case of termination
Food Corporation Of India Workers Union vs Food Corporation Of India & Anr. on 16
2015 before the
Supreme Court. Allegedly chagrined thereby, the petitioner started
victimising Respondent No. 3, to a point where, on 21st March, 2015,
Respondent
B.S.Methaila vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. on 1 July, 2019
letter dated 3.2.1999, in order to
protect the dignity and escape from victimisation. She
also stated therein that
