charge
against the petitioner - accused No.5 is that, by wrongly
describing the boundaries of the property including the property
belonging to the defacto complainant ... respondent
would make the following submissions:
i) The petitioner by wrongly describing
boundaries of the land belonging to the complainant filed
an appeal before
sale deed dated 17.8.2016. The boundaries shown
by the plaintiffs to the property as 40/871 is the boundaries of
the defendant property, that ... Whether defendants prove that plaintiff have
show wrong boundaries to Sy.No.40/871/40
which is boundary of his properties?
5. Whether defendants proves
borrowed an amount of Rs.500/- to meet his financial
needs. The boundaries mentioned in the sale deed tallies with
the sketch reports ... registered sale deed is wrongly described as Sy.No.108/2
instead Sy.No.16/3. The boundaries mentioned in the deed are
in consonance
Civil
Procedure Code to amend the decree 'B' schedule boundary, is
not maintainable, hence, in the absence of any source of power ... that
there was a Typographical error in wrongly describing the
-4-
CRP No. 506 of 2018
boundary towards South, and the Trial Court taking into
inherently wrong so as to affect the very process of taking
over such as the identity of the land or the boundaries
thereof
inherently wrong so as to affect the very process of taking
over such as the identity of the land or the boundaries
thereof
inherently wrong so as to affect the very process of taking
over such as the identity of the land or the boundaries
thereof
inherently wrong so as to affect the very process of
taking over such as the identity of the land or the
boundaries thereof
inherently wrong so as to affect the very process of taking
over such as the identity of the land or the boundaries
thereof
inherently wrong so as to affect the
very process of taking over such as the identity of the land
or the boundaries thereof
