Combination Registration No.C-2018/05/571 involving
Walmart International Holdings, Inc., the Competition Commission of
India held that it cannot look into provisions
M/S. Itc Limited vs Nestle India Limited on 10 June, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
Supreme Court concluded, in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
v. Samara Brothers Inc.(Walmart Stores), 2000 SCC OnLine US SC 27, that
“a product design cannot ... respect, judgments
interpreting Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, such as Walmart Stores, may
be distinguished because Section 43(a)(3) thereof imposes
Supreme Court concluded, in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
v. Samara Brothers Inc.(Walmart Stores), 2000 SCC OnLine US SC 27,
that “a product design cannot ... respect, judgments
interpreting Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, such as Walmart Stores, may
be distinguished because Section 43(a)(3) thereof imposes
Supreme Court concluded, in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
v. Samara Brothers Inc.(Walmart Stores), 2000 SCC OnLine US SC 27, that
“a product design cannot ... respect, judgments
interpreting Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, such as Walmart Stores, may
be distinguished because Section 43(a)(3) thereof imposes
defendant
2023 SCC Online Del even that the
5824 interlocutory stage.
23. Walmart Stores Inc. Vs. -- Product design can never
Samara Brothers Inc. be inherently
defendant
2023 SCC Online Del even that the
5824 interlocutory stage.
23. Walmart Stores Inc. Vs. -- Product design can never
Samara Brothers Inc. be inherently
