acted upon but was executed to protect the property against his wayward life, After
the death of Devallu, the defendants did not heed ... first plaintiff that Devallu, her husband was leading a wayward life and was addicted to drinking and other vices and a deed of relinquishment
involved in the other bad habits and leading an immoral and wayward life, the plaintiffs have purchased the properties, when there was no legal necessity ... further contended that the first defendant was leading an immoral and wayward life and that he was addicted to drink, gambling and other bad habits
father Singaram was addicted to alcohol and he was leading a wayward life. He
never cared for the welfare of the plaintiff, who was minor ... plaintiff was never addicted to alcohol and never led any wayward
life. Since he has sustained loss in agriculture, he has borrowed certain debts
daughter of his father. The first defendant was leading a wayward life. She did not mend herself in spite of advice given by the plaintiff ... false to state that the first defendant was leading a wayward life and the second defendant is not son of Thirugnanasambandam husband of the first
third defendant became addicted to liquor and was
leading a wayward life and spent the family income for illegal purposes
and failed to maintain ... defendant as if he has
become a drunkard and leading a wayward life after the birth of the
second plaintiff are totally false
through the first appellant and Balasubramanian. The said Balasubramanian
led a wayward life and therefore, in the presence of elders, the second
appellant ... appellants have failed to prove that the said Balasubramanian led a wayward
life and the alleged oral partition took place in the year
drinks. He is a spent thrift and he is leading a wayward life. He did not maintain the family consisting of the plaintiff ... plaintiff that the second defendant is the drunkard and leading wayward life. It is the contention of the first defendant that the second defendant
that the husband of the plaintiff, who was leading a wayward life would not be able to lay his hands on those properties. Later ... plaintiff that her husband was a spent-thrift and living a wayward life is an utter falsehood. According to the defendants, the properties were purchased
been falsely implicated. According to him,
he took objection to the wayward life led by his
wife and P.W.1, which compelled them ... point out that there is plenty of evidence
regarding the wayward life of P.Ws.1 and 4 and the
act of accused
second defendant was a drunkard and he was leading a wayward life with concubines. According to the plaint, the debts incurred by the second defendant ... produced before the Court to connect the debts and the alleged wayward life of the second defendant. There is no presumption in law that
