adopted a twin strategy to circumvent Section 2 of the Act. First is to convince us that there is no act of breaking ... work ancillary to conservation, development and management of forests and wildlife.
6. First contention of the learned Government Pleader has no support from the factual
Judicial First Class
Magistrate Court-I, Sulthan Bathery. They and the first accused
faced prosecution in the court below under Sections ... read with Section 51 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act on
the allegation that the first accused trespassed into the
Government Forest at the Alathur Section
trees will be cut and removed is also denied by the first respondent. First respondent's stand is that in the process of implementation ... first respondent. First respondent has admitted that one of the objectives of the project is to provide facilities to the wildlife tourists to view
BOOK OF CAPTIVE ELEPHANT OF KERALA
FOREST AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENMT
ANNEXURE A5 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.
1000/2023 DATED 01.07.2023 BEFORE
read
with Section 51 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. By
judgment dated 30.4.2003, the learned Judicial First Class
Magistrate-II (Forest Offences), Manjeri, convicted ... Wildlife (Protection) Act,
1972. In default of payment of fine first accused
shall undergo simple imprisonment for six months
Governor of the state.
8. The specific contention of the first respondent herein was
that, the Minister and the Government officials flouted the laws,
gave ... Chief Wildlife Warden/Authorised
Officer under section 40(4) of the Act. Hence, for the purpose of
quick verification, holding that the first respondent alone
FIRST CLASS -
III, THRISSUR
PETITIONER:
STATE,
REPRESENTED BY THE ASSISTANT WILDLIFE WARDEN
PEECHI- VAZHANI WILDLIFE SANCTUARY IN CRIME NO.OR
4/2014.
BY SRI.NAGARAJ ... Code of the Criminal Procedure before the Court of the
Judicial First Class Magistrate-III, Thrissur ('learned
Magistrate', for short). By Annexure
trophy of the wild animal physeter shown
in the first schedule to the Wildlife (Protection
Wildlife (Protection) Act
1972 (Amendment Act 2022). The petitioner was
arrested on 02.10.2024.
2. The crux of the prosecution case is that:
the second accused ... protected under Schedule 1 of the
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, and sold the same to the
first accused. The first accused consumed a portion
Arms Act,
1878. The applicant in BA No.2297/2021 is the first accused in OR No.4/2021
of Thamarassery Forest Range for having ... Kerala Wildlife
Protection Act, 1972.
2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the first accused in all these
three crimes was allegedly conducting
