issued with seven charges being levelled against him for carrying passengers without tickets on two occasions i.e. 21.05.1991 and 01.07.1991. The charges were replied ... then contended that the finding that four passengers were travelling without ticket is totally wrong and tickets were issued to all the passengers who were
reads:
(b) A is charged with traveling on a railway without
ticket. The burden of proving that he had a ticket
reads:
“(b) A is charged with travelling on a railway
without ticket. The burden of proving that
he had a ticket
reads:
(b) A is charged with travelling on a railway
without ticket. The burden of proving that he
had a ticket is on him.
Where
reads:
"(b) A is charged with travelling on a railway without ticket. The burden of proving that he had a
ticket
charged with travelling
CRA 108/09 54
on a railway without ticket, the burden of
proving that he had a ticket is on him. When
reads:
"(b) A is charged with travelling on a railway without ticket.
The burden of proving that he had a ticket
reads:
'(b) A is charged with travelling on a
railway without ticket. The burden of
proving that he had a ticket
reads:
"(b) A is charged with traveling on a railway without ticket. The burden of proving that he had a ticket
reads:
(b) A is charged with travelling on a railway without
ticket. The burden of proving that he had a ticket is
on him.
Where
