from the record that a similar
PIL challenging the grant of Z+ security to the private
respondents no. 2 to 6, inter alia, was dismissed ... High
Court of Bombay has earlier also recognized the need for
Z+ security for the respondents no. 2 to 6, and the
Special Leave Petition
recalling and modifying
the order dated 13.06.2025 for seeking withdrawal of Z+ Security Cover provided
to respondent no.5 (Shri Anant Mukesh Ambani ... 11164-
11165/2022 directing the Union of India to provide adequate Z+ security to
private respondent nos.2 to 6 therein including present respondent
control over the relevant department, absence of flight risk, and Z+ security
cover, which ensured that anticipatory bail would not hinder the investigation.
7
MANU
control over the relevant department, absence of flight risk, and Z+ security
cover, which ensured that anticipatory bail would not hinder the investigation.
7
MANU
from a naxalite effected area and therefore he has been
provided Z+ security and no person or car could have entered his
residential premises without
payment of Rs.
1,84,237/- to M/s Black Cat Z Security and Allied
Services on 19.11.2018 under Section 201 of the
Income
payment of Rs.
1,84,237/- to M/s Black Cat Z Security and Allied
Services on 19.11.2018 under Section 201 of the
Income
Banerjee on Facebook. the phone number of
the petitioner being a Z
category security
holder.
The complaint looks
like it was already typed
Banerjee on Facebook. the phone number of
the petitioner being a Z
category security
holder.
The complaint looks
like it was already typed
Banerjee on Facebook. the phone number of
the petitioner being a Z
category security
holder.
The complaint looks
like it was already typed
