Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Assistant General Manager State Bank Of ... vs Radhey Shyam Pandey on 2 March, 2020 Equivalent

Union Of India vs Recon on 13 February, 2020 Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2020 BOM 1348

agreement is caused by coercion, fraud or misrepresentation, the agreement is a contract voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused ... a contract of the party on whom such fraud was practised, or to whom such misrepresentation was made, does not render a contract voidable

said to be void; (h) An agreement enforceable by law is a contract; (i) An agreement which is enforceable by law at the option ... option of the other or others, is a voidable contract; (j) A contract which ceases to be enforceable by law becomes void when it ceases

means and includes any of the following acts committed by a party to a contract, or with his connivance, or by his agent, with intent ... agreement is caused by coercion, fraud or misrepresentation, the agreement is a contract voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused

a particular act of a contract but it should go to its roots rendering the performance of the rest of the contract ... contract in which time is essential. - When a party to a contract promises to do a certain thing at or before a specified time

agreement is a contract voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused. A party to a contract, whose consent was caused ... practised, or to whom such misrepresentation was made, does not render a contract voidable." 24. In the case of Shri Krishan Vs. Kurukshetra University

provisions of Indian Contract Act . As per Section 173 of the Act, the pawnee is conferred with a right to retain the pledged articles till ... Even in cases, where pledge is made by a person in possession under a voidable contract, as per Section 178-A

Indian Contract Act, when the consent to an agreement is caused by undue influence, the agreement is a contract voidable at the option ... whom holds a real or apparent authority over the other. Such contracts, which affect a large number of persons or a group of persons

proceed as per law after hearing plaintiff and his vendor. Plaintiff is a bonafide purchaser. Defendant Nos.1 to 4 are trying to dispossess plaintiff ... violated the condition. Hence, the Sale Deed of plaintiff is a voidable contract. Plaintiff is not a bonafide purchaser. Plaintiff is not in possession