appellants contends that the Federal Court in the case in A. H. Wadia v. Commissioner of Income-tax , had held that if the borrower without ... observed :
"The Federal Court in a recent judgment reported in A. H. Wadia v. Commissioner of Income-tax , had laid down that
inside sale. Taxation of income on the basis of nexus doctrine is a familiar proposition recognised in Raliegh Investment Company case ... A. S6 : (1948) F.L.J. 32 : ( 1948) 2 M.L.J. 62,, and A. H. Wadia v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay
Madras General Sales Tax Act must be understood in a popular sense and sales tax can be levied under the Act if the transaction substantially ... that person in respect of his foreign income."
In -- 'A.H. Wadia v. Commissioner of Income-tax', Bombay
case of a money-lender, who was also the owner of a large extent of agricultural lands, and who, in the course of his business ... business. In the judgment of this court, reference was made to A. H. Wadia v. Commissioner of Income-tax , wherein Mahajan, J., observed :
"Mere
possible to challenge the power of a non-sovereign legislative body to make a law having extra-territorial operation on the ground that ... which is sovereign, are subject to no such limitation.
12. In A.H. Wadia v. Commissioner of Income
third class represented by W.P. No. 84 of 1967 consists of a case of registered dealers who in another State make contracts for local ... Income-tax, Bombay State [1948] F.C.R. 1 and A.H. Wadia v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay [1948] F.C.R. 121. Though
each one of the petitioners have a right to know
and that can be done only when a copy of the award in entirety ... Special Land Acquisition Officer v. Trustees of the Will of
A.H. Wadia , reported in 1956 SCC OnLine
Bombay to the contrary reported in Dhanraj Keshrimal v. H. H. Wadia , 57 Bom. 413 : (A. I. R. (20) 1933 Bom. 80). In a conflict ... invalidates Dhanraj Keshrimal v. H. H. Wadia , 57 Bom. 413: (A. I. R. (20) 1933 Bom. 80). The substance of the decision is set forth
order transposing a defendant as a plaintiff -- 'Official Assignee v. Ramalingappa ', AIR 1928 Mad 554 (E); an order adding a party --'Rama ... order referring back a report of the Official Referee to him -- 'Maneckji v. H. H. Wadia ', AIR 1923 Mad 470 (G) have
support of this proposition, and Pestanji Mancharji Wadia v. Matchett 7 Bom. H.C.R. (A.C.J.) 10 was also cited as a further ... fact that after a contract has been made between A and B, A gives G authority be act for him for a consideration, does
