Anita Bhushan,
tried to remove the Copper-T but failed and thereafter aborted the child.
2. In the Consumer Complaint filed against
Dr. Anita Bhushan ... very rightly rejected the plea of the Revision Petitioner that the abortion of
the child was done by the Revision Petitioner on the request
PMCH, it was
noticed that there was history of abortion on 10.12.2001, complaints of vomiting
and she had not passed stools for three days. Further ... inclusive of
impropriety in dealing with the patient by conducting DNC procedure (abortion)
without preparing any record about the same and showing the medical
exigency
failed and she was
in fact pregnant. She was offered an
abortion by the Petitioner/Clinic but it refused to give any guarantee ... realized that she
was pregnant it was too late for an abortion
.
In our
view, the respondents, first displayed their negligence in not properly informing
before the State Commission was that the deceased had already
undergone an abortion before the present pregnancy. Between October 1999 and
August
