Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Asia Publishing House vs John Wiley And Sons, Inc. on 18 August, 1967 Equivalent citations

Shri Anand Patwardh A N vs The Director General on 31 March, 2009 Author: Roshan

manner curtail the civil or criminal remedies of the copyright societies or owner of the copyright to institute proceedings under Section 55 or Chapter XIII ... that the Circular dated 30.01.2024 in no manner abridges the powers of the copyright societies or copyright owners to prosecute copyright infringers. I say that

manner curtail the civil or criminal remedies of the copyright societies or owner of the copyright to institute proceedings under Section 55 or Chapter XIII ... that the Circular dated 30.01.2024 in no manner abridges the powers of the copyright societies or copyright owners to prosecute copyright infringers. I say that

judgment in the headnote is not an abridgment of the judgment and no copyright can be claimed therein. 45. According to us, the conclusion arrived

judgment in the headnote is not an abridgment of the judgment and no copyright can be claimed therein. 45. According to us, the conclusion arrived

neither case is there any attempt at real abridgment in the language of the abridger, but the tests are practically quotations from the original work ... abridgment entitled to protection. To shorten a work by leaving out the unimportant parts is not to abridge it in a legal sense. To abridge

neither case is ther6 any attempt at real abridgment in the language of the abridger, but the texts are practically quotations from the original work ... result is not merely copying. To constitute a proper abridgment, the arrangement of the book abridged must be preserved, the ideas must also be taken

Copyright," published in 1904 and 1915 respectively, i. e., before and after the Copyright Act of 1911. The passages are supported by the authorities ... added. The first runs thus:- To constitute a proper abridgment, the arrangement of the book abridged must be preserved, the ideas must also be taken

this case where the aggregate of the similarities between the copyrighted work and the coy lead to the cumulative effect that the defendant had imitated ... imitation or of appropriation of the labour of the owner of the copyright by the defendant is proved." 30. In the case of Harman