V. Rev. Mother Provincial, ... vs State Of Kerala, Represented By The ... on 19 September, 1969
majority of votes and the educational agency is assured of an absolute majority of votes no decision can be taken by the governing body
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 3590 (2.16 seconds)President vs Representedstate Election Commission on 29 October, 2015
seats
each and thus the UDF coalition secured absolute majority. The
petitioners herein submitted Form 11 declarations, declaring their
political affiliation as members
The Principal vs The University Of Calicut on 16 March, 2020
minimum majority of members in the meeting for having
legitimacy to the view taken as that of the view taken by the
majority ... other member. The quorum of a body
is an absolute majority of it unless the authority by
which the body was created fixes
Swami Sukruthananda vs Sree Narayana Dharma Sangham Trust
taken therein is valid only if it is
supported by an absolute majority in the entire
Board. No business other than those specified ... taken therein is valid only if it is supported by in
absolute majority of all members of the Sanghom.
No business other than those specified
M.G.George Muthoot vs State Of Kerala on 21 January, 2010
information, giving evidence in court
and sometimes getting compensation, there is absolutely no
major role for the victims including family members
especially in heinous crimes
Viswambharan vs Dhanya on 14 January, 2005
majority. Such liability to maintain the child, whatever be the sex, would continue until the child attains majority whether the child ... until they are married notwithstanding the fact that they have attained majority is absolutely correct and does not call for interference at all. The challenge
Scaria Korah Of Thayil vs Koran Mathu Of Thayil And Ors. on 5 February, 1962
surrendered to the plaintiff on his attaining majority and that B schedule properties were to be taken absolutely by defendants 1 and 2, in equal ... only be that A's absolute estate was subject to defeasance on the attainment of majority by B when the estate will vest
Nabeesa vs State Of Kerala
instances of harassment as the cause for committing suicide.
There is absolutely no major contradiction in the versions spoken
by them. It is true that
Mary Sonia Zachariah vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 24 February, 1995
Mary Sonia Zachariah vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 24 February, 1995
Equivalent
Chacko Mathew vs Ayyappan Kutty on 19 December, 1961
tarwad, but had not 'the written consent of all the major members of the tarwad' as required by Section 21 of the Travancore ... tarwad the written consent of all the major members of the tarwad is absolutely necessary. The sale deed executed without the sanction of some