There was no special contract.
On 14.6.1999, the vehicle met with an accident. Suresh
Chandra Variyal, died. The widow and daughter of Suresh
Chandra Variyal ... being driven
by Mahmood Hasan at the time of the accident. The deceased
was an occupant of the car. The car was being used
Award, on the ground that it had been omitted due to an accidental slip :
"Hence, it is my decision in this case that ... clerical or
arithmetical mistake, or error in the order arising from any accidental
slip or omission, empowers the Labour Court to grant a relief
Tehsil Cooperative Union and insured with
the appellant met with an accident on 4.3.1996. The
vehicle had a carrying capacity of 42 passengers, one
driver ... than the driver and the
conductor.
3. On the day of the accident, the materials
indicate that the bus was overloaded. There were at
least
respect of
death of passengers travelling in goods carriage. The dates of accident being
different, different provisions would apply. We would notice the law
operating ... respect of death or
bodily injury of a victim of the accident. It is,
therefore, apparent that the limit contained
case was closed. A Claim
Petition was filed before the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal
against the driver, owner and the Insurance Company with which ... discussions in issue No. 1, have failed to prove that
the accident dated 23rd January, 2001 was caused by
rash and negligent driving of tempo
injured Vijay Kumar Mittal, sustained serious injuries in a road accident stated to be caused by the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle ... Injured was aged 23 years as on the date of the accident. He was a scrap dealer.
7. On account of injuries sustained
very high speed in rash and
negligent manner which resulted in an accident
at Yashwant Nagar. Due to said accident, Ram
Narainbrother ... question and heard the
parties. According the complainant, at the time
of accident, vehicle was driven by Mohd.
Julfikar who was having a licence
Schedule of the Plaint through
inadvertence.
That it is an accidental error.
That it is a clear case of misdescription of the suit
property ... correct its own error in a judgment, decree or order from any accidental slip
or omission. The principle behind the said provision is actus curiae
omission which set in train the events leading to the accident, and (2) on the evidence as it stands at the relevant time ... more likely than not that the effective cause of the accident was some act or omission of the defendant or of someone for whom
Karanataka in a tractor trailer. The said tractor
trailer met with an accident allegedly owing to rash and negligent driving on
the part ... Where death or permanent disablement of any
person has resulted from an accident arising out of the
use of a motor vehicle or motor vehicles
