from doing any work, which he was capable of performing before the accident. It was further contended that the Labour Deputy Commissioner ought to have ... rate of 12 per cent from the date of the accident under Section 4(A)(3) of the Workmen's Compensation Act without imposing
children and father of the deceased Asha, who died in the motor accident that had occurred on 2.3.2005.
2. The brief facts are that ... succumbed to the injuries on 11.3.2005 in the said hospital. The accident was intimated in writing to the Inspector of Police, Pondy Bazaar with
Korukkupet on 3.6.2006 and due to overcrowding in the Train, he had accidentally fallen down from the train between Wimco Nagar and Kathivakkam Railway Stations ... defended the claim, disputing the version of the claimants that the deceased accidentally fell down due to overcrowding. It is stated in the counter that
deceased in the electric train and also denied that he had accidentally fallen down from the running train and sustained grievous injuries ... authorities nor any chain pulling reported on the alleged date of the accident, there was no such incident at all and the Appellant
Company to pay the compensation.
2. The admitted facts are that the accident took place on 5.12.006 on 1.00 p.m. in Periakolappalur Village Koot ... deceased causing, fatal injuries to her. The Tribunal found that the accident took place due to the negligence driving of the driver of the Motorcycle
door ways exposing his body outside, which resulted in the accident. Therefore, the accident is due to the rash and negligent act of the deceased ... would not attract the provisions of 'accidental falling from train' under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 (herein after referred
Judicial Magistrate (MACT) Namakkal.
2. The Appellant/Claimant sustained injures in the accident that occurred on 15.5.1998 at 5.30 a.m. when he was travelling ... stated that on the date of the accident, the driver of the Transport Corporation was driving the bus in the Salem-Bangalore Main Road
aggrieved against the award passed by the learned Additional Special Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, at Krishnagiri, Dharmapuri ... impugned award, the Tribunal has found that the accident occurred solely due to the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle/tractor and awarded
after referred to as the Act) and from the date of the accident, which, according to him, is the date on which the compensation payable ... Appellant/workman contends that the said expression signifies the date of accident itself because the amount is payable by the employer the moment the workman
falling from train, for which the Appellant is not responsible. Therefore, the accident is due to the rash and negligent act of the deceased ... would not attract the provisions of 'accidental falling from train' under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 (herein after referred
