smuggling, black-marketing, hoarding, adulteration,
prohibition etc. whenever they involve politically
influential accused. Arrest and enlargement on bail
of persons involved in such offences
Sri. Basavaprabhu Swamiji vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2023
Author: R. Devdas
Bench
Mr. S. K. Basavarajan vs State Of Karnataka By on 3 November, 2023
Author: R
13613/2009 raising certain grounds like the accused are
influential and powerful persons and they have challenged
the cognizance taken in CC No.13613/2009 ... case and on the complaint made that the accused are
influential and powerful persons, who went up to the
Supreme Court and failed in their
Smt Malathi vs State Of Karnataka By on 29 September, 2020
Bench: B.Veerappa , K
live-in
relationship with accused No. 1. Accused No. 1 is in the
habit of filing false cases. Accused No.1 sent the victim ... also indicates
24
that accused No. 1 is having close contacts with Police
officials. Accused No. 1 is politically influential and it is
alleged that
formed an opinion that
the Investigating Officer has obliged for the influential
accused and has filed 'B' report. Therefore, the Trial
Court proceeded ... that he might have yielded to the pressure of the
influential accused, which resulted in filing of the 'B'
report. Thereafter, the Court
this regard was filed with Banahatti police. But since
6
the accused are influential, police have not registered
any criminal complaint. On 06.06.2014, the
complainant ... complaint and that the same was not entertained
as the accused were influential. The complainant also
appears to have stated that she had gone
real culprit and it continued to be a UDR case.
However, accused No.4-Jagan was arrested in Crime
No.80/2022 in respect ... painter Ramesh in 2015 since he raised
some voice against other influential accused persons. Prima-
facie there is material evidence available against the present
petitioner
with the appointment of the second respondent. It was also contended that accused has no locus standi to challenge the appointment of the second respondent ... case requiring special study and also the fact that the accused are influential persons, Government thought it fit to appoint respondent 2 as Special Public
