been done in another case, direction should be given. doing
another wrong. No one has a right to cvlaiin-perlforniance. offan f
unlawful or illegal ... similar legal foothold. it does not
'ocouiitenance repetition of a wrong action to bring both wrongs on a
ifpar. 'Even hypothetically
ankles; he
'Rs.50,000/-- towards treatment.
. Placing actionable wrong on the driver, claim was filed
which was resisted by all the respondents, particularly
ibus driver and
placed actionable wrong .i_o'n"iri.i§*n*; freach such conclusion
the Tribunal_..ha;s '1-taken
denied ail contentions raised by the ciaimants and tried to
place actionable wrong on the rider oi' the motorcycle. It
also urged that motorcyclist
affirmative holding that driver
of the maxicab is responsible for actionable wrong, That
finding is not questioned and has reached finality
injuries in the imotorj;vehici'e-.,accildegnt'.
Fastening actionable wrong on the 'driver ofbtiie' lorry 'the,
Tribunal held him entitle
expenses, etc. The claim
Twas resisted' by the respondents placing actionable wrong
V' tahegclaimant, but the Tribunal has negated such defence
held
claimant, his
3&5
witnesses and 31 documents, Tribunal held actionable
wrong on the driver of the car and held him responsible. It
also
resisted by
the Insurance Company.
(}f2/
4. The claimant placed actionable wrong on the
driver of the Karnataka State Road
Corporation bus. During the trial ... amount of compensation
awarded. She has assertively contended
actionable wrong could be fastened on
it is due to the rash and negligent
driver. the Vehicle
orry
driver responsible for the actionable wrong. T__h'ai:ifiVnd:iI%g.V4i's%
not questioned by the respondents
