custody of respondent Nos.4 and 5
because of wrongful action of the customs authorities. In this
connection, he has also referred to Regulation ... charges for such period when the
detention was on account of wrongful action of the official
respondents. He has particularly referred to Regulation
therefore, they rushed to Mumbai, to resolve the
misunderstanding and wrongful action against the petitioners and
to meet their daughter. However, the daughter
therefore, they rushed to Mumbai, to resolve the
misunderstanding and wrongful action against the petitioners and
to meet their daughter. However, the daughter
having to rush praying to this Court to interfere in
this wrongful action on the part of respondent. If the
Assessing Ofcer had checked
there was an assertion of a continuing wrong which gave
rise to a recurring cause of action. The aggrieved employees
were receiving salary every month ... paid thereby giving rise to a
fresh cause of action based on continuing wrong. [Yogendra
Shrivastava (supra)]; and
(vi) If a petition is filed beyond
civil remedy. The
Respondent must be shown to be in wrongful conduct. Its actions
must be shown to ones in violation of the contract
entire action of
arresting the petitioner and then his remand to judicial custody was
illegal as four specific distinct legal entities were wrongly treated ... wrongly availed by the petitioner on the basis of such fake sale and
purchase activities. On this basis, it was submitted that the action
Competent Authority,
Colaba is directed to take action against Mr. Rajesh Koyale who
has been wrongly allotted tenement no.403 by society letter dated
initiates an action in public interest is to be turned away at the
threshold merely on the ground that the Governmental action
in question does ... have
standing to maintain an action for judicial redress in respect of
a public wrong or a public injury, not only the cause of legality
that applicants
seek to justify its criminal action of forging and fabricating
documents and fraudulently and wrongfully transferring the
property of respondent ... which the applicant seeks to justify criminal
action of forging and fabricating documents and
fraudulently and wrongly transferred the property of
complainant to IRIS
