Smt Ramya H N vs State Of Karnataka on 10 April, 2026
Author: S.R
well as acquiescence. Those persons who
did not challenge the wrongful action in their cases
and acquiesced into the same and woke up after
long
well as acquiescence.
Those persons who did not challenge the
wrongful action in their cases and acquiesced
into the same and woke up after long
said accident was caused due to the actionable wrong on
the part of the vehicle insured with the respondent No.2-
Insurance Company. The records
sheet clearly indicates that the accident was
caused due to the actionable wrong of the driver of the
water tanker. It is further
agony, harassment, and injury
caused by the illegal and oppressive SARFAESI
enforcement action, including:
a. Compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs ... expenses and
professional fees incurred by the Petitioner in defending
this wrongful enforcement action, to be assessed by this
Hon'ble Court;
F. Direct
been raised
including that the authority ought not to have taken action
regarding wrongful availment of ITC unless action was
taken against the supplier ... would be appropriate taking note of the order
making detailed reference to wrongful availment of ITC, to
set aside the impugned order at Annexure
The Assistant Commissioner Of Central ... vs M/S. Veremax Technologie Services ... on 24 April, 2026
The Additional Director vs M/S S.R.S Travels And Logistics Private ... on 24
The Commissioner Of Central Excise vs M/S. G.M. Agro And Beverages (India) ... on