than one person is concerned in the commission of a wrong the person wronged has his remedy against all or any of them ... action, however, is entirely distinct from an action in ejectment. At common law there were only two kinds of redress from actionable wrong
that it was wrong, that any attempt on the part of the plaintiff's father to have defended the action would have been utterly
debtor. We do not think the law intended, or desired, to encourage action of this kind on the judgment-debtor's part ... facts and in law the judgment-debtor has put himself in the wrong.
9. We dismiss the appeal Costs throughout on the appellant
authorities is that a man cannot, by merely changing his form of action, vary the amount of damages so as to recover more than ... date in May or June, or even possibly the trial of the action, or the date of judgment, if once you are to depart from
Kumar Ganganand Singh And Ors. vs Maharaja Sir Rameshwar Singh Bahadur ... on 1 February, 1927
Chanbasappa Gurushantappa Hiremath vs Baslingayya Gokurnaya Hiremath on 14 April, 1927
Equivalent citations: (1927)29BOMLR1254
Mathuradas Canji Matani vs Ebrahim Fazalbhoy on 14 April, 1927
Equivalent citations: (1927)29BOMLR1296, AIR
R.A. Arunachala Ayyar vs Louis Dreyfus And Co. on 12 September, 1927
Equivalent citations
Dasharathi Ghosh vs Khondkar Abdul Hannan on 27 July, 1927
Equivalent citations: AIR1928CAL68, AIR 1928
alternative that either is liable to the plaintiff.
6. The cause of action in this case is the alleged negligence of the driver ... ascertaining who is liable for the act of a wrong doer...you must look to the wrong-doer himself or to the first person
