given for doing another wrong. It would not be setting a wrong right, but would be perpetuating another wrong. In such matters there ... similar legal foothold. It does not countenance repetition of a wrong action to bring both wrongs on a par. Even if hypothetically it is accepted
which the defendants were the proprietors. The plaintiff brought this action for wrongful refusal to receive him as a guest but did not allege
Legislature and Executive commit wrongs judiciary to rectify and to put the same in order. When the Executives do wrong, good suggestions and judgments would ... statements are of threatening nature. In case newspapers gave wrong reporting, action can be taken against them and confidence in thejudiciary to be protected
does not cheat, but is liable only to a civil action for breach of contract.
(h) A intentionally deceives Z into a belief that ... walk away with the impression that no action can be taken against them. A wrongful or illegal act such as cheating may give rise
implied contract, would virtually alter the nature of cause of action. The fact that the discretion of the Tribunal, dealing with the claim, is circumscribed ... hardly leaves any doubt that the causes of action in the first exception relate to the wrongs defined under the I.P.C . The Legislature
mala fide intention which resulted in delay or that any wrongful gain was derived by the promoters by intentionally allowing the delay to creep ... that there is something wrong and does not make further enquiries. Being aware of possible harm to others, and action in spite thereof, is acting
making 'monetary amends' under the public law for the wrong done due to breach of public duty, of not protecting the fundamental rights ... follows:
There is no wrong without a remedy. The laws wills that in every case where a man is wronged and damaged, he must have
negligence, dereliction of duty and fabricating the record with wrong entries by showing that action was al ready taken on the complaint given ... gravity of the criminal offence in the records with wrong entries by showing that action was already taken on the complaint given by the petitioner
petitioners issued a reply on 19.9.2003 and. therefore, the cause of action arose to the 1st respondent to file a complaint in the month ... that once a cause of action arose on notice dated 9.9.2003, the 1st respondent cannot invent another cause of action by issuing a 2nd notice
come to a conclusion that the cause of action or part of cause of action arose at Renigunta or within the territorial jurisdiction of Tirupati ... worked and retired at Renigunta, no cause of action or no part of cause of action can be said to have arisen at Renigunta
