Commissioner Of Customs (P) vs Babulal Purohit, Electronics ... on 25 July, 2006
confiscation of such goods means putting a seal of approval to wrong action of the department.
5. The main contention of the department is that
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 572 (1.79 seconds)M.A. Qureshi vs The Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya ... on 21 December, 2006
basic principle of rule of law and good administration that even administrative actions should be just and fair.
(Italics ours).
Examining this case ... never be approved. Misplaced sympathy can never be a justification for wrong actions. We are not impressed from another plea that applicant has been sought
Sushma Grover & Ors vs Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd. on 15 May, 2006
letter dated
19-11-1999. In our view the allotment
was wrongly cancelled as the appellant was entitled for not only allotment and
possession ... appellant, the appellant needs to be
compensated adequately for the wrongful action on the part of the respondent in
cancelling the flat and indulging
Delhi Vidyut Board, vs Sai Industries on 20 September, 2006
consumer is entitled for the benefit arising from
the deficiency or wrongful action of the service provider.
7. In our view nothing prevented the
appellant
Dr. Jayaseelan Mathias vs Dr. Mathias Russeliah Morris And Ors. on 29 August, 2006
been held that mere technicalities cannot frustrate harsh, burdensome and wrongful action of the respondents under the provisions of Section
Jason Links (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs State Bank Of India And Anr. on 27 March, 2006
appellant Company to the tune of Rs. 1,500 lakh. This wrongful action in not renewing the Bank guarantee gave a big jolt, seriously
Rithwik Energy Systems Limited ... vs Transmission Corporation Of Andhra ... on 28 September, 2006
concerned, it was held that the commission found nothing wrong in the action of the first respondent in settling the power supply claim ... impugned order, it did not find any thing wrong in the action of the first respondent in settling power supply claims of the appellants with
In Re: Investigation Into Initial ... vs Unknown on 21 November, 2006
regulator may use any available remedy to make good the wrong done. Such remedial actions could include rescinding a fraudulent sale, secure disgorgement or order ... exigencies of the situation, as demonstrated by the action of sale by one of the wrong-doer in the Saumil Bhavnagri case pending stay
Commissioner Of Central Excise vs Sarang Springs P. Ltd. on 4 April, 2006
cannot be denied on wire, merely because the manufacturer of wire has wrongly paid the duty.
It is pertinent to note then cenvat scheme ... ground that such inputs were not liable for duty - if any action for wrong payment of duty required to be taken, it should
Siel Limited vs The Punjab State Electricity ... on 26 May, 2006
Siel Limited vs The Punjab State Electricity ... on 26 May, 2006
Equivalent citations: 2006ELR(APTEL