Uday Shankar Pd vs The Bihar Vidhan Parishad & Or on 20 August, 2016
Chairman has not complied with the Rules. For
inaction or a wrong action of the Chairman, the consequences cannot
fall on the petitioner
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 311 (2.55 seconds)The State Of Bihar & Ors vs Madhusudan Prasad Verma on 24 November, 2016
post because he was not promoted. Therefore,
for the inaction or wrong action of the appellants, the writ applicant
cannot be denied consequential monetary benefits
Ravindra Kumar Singh vs The High Court Of Judicature At Patna & ... on 8 January, 2016
make out a case by making specific pleading
that impugned action of wrong framing of questions/model
answers had, in fact, adversely affected their right ... they had answered the
question correctly by marking (c); but because of wrong model
answer, they got 0 (zero) mark/negative marks. In the
absence
Deo Narayan Prasad vs The High Court Of Judicature At Patna & ... on 8 January, 2016
make out a case by making specific pleading
that impugned action of wrong framing of questions/model
answers had, in fact, adversely affected their right ... they had answered the
question correctly by marking (c); but because of wrong model
answer, they got 0 (zero) mark/negative marks. In the
absence
Rajiv Kumar Singh & Anr vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 January, 2016
make out a case by making specific pleading
that impugned action of wrong framing of questions/model
answers had, in fact, adversely affected their right ... they had answered the
question correctly by marking (c); but because of wrong model
answer, they got 0 (zero) mark/negative marks. In the
absence
Avanindra Kumar Jha vs The High Court Of Judicature At Patna & ... on 8 January, 2016
make out a case by making specific pleading
that impugned action of wrong framing of questions/model
answers had, in fact, adversely affected their right ... they had answered the
question correctly by marking (c); but because of wrong model
answer, they got 0 (zero) mark/negative marks. In the
absence
Amarnath Yadav vs The High Court Of Judicature At Patna & ... on 8 January, 2016
make out a case by making specific pleading
that impugned action of wrong framing of questions/model
answers had, in fact, adversely affected their right ... they had answered the
question correctly by marking (c); but because of wrong model
answer, they got 0 (zero) mark/negative marks. In the
absence
Rakesh Kumar Sinha & Anr vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 January, 2016
make out a case by making specific pleading
that impugned action of wrong framing of questions/model
answers had, in fact, adversely affected their right ... they had answered the
question correctly by marking (c); but because of wrong model
answer, they got 0 (zero) mark/negative marks. In the
absence
Baban Kumar Sharma vs The High Court Of Judicatrue At Patna & ... on 8 January, 2016
make out a case by making specific pleading
that impugned action of wrong framing of questions/model
answers had, in fact, adversely affected their right ... they had answered the
question correctly by marking (c); but because of wrong model
answer, they got 0 (zero) mark/negative marks. In the
absence
Gopal Jha vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 20 October, 2016
dues no deduction can be made but if
the story is wrong, the action of the Corporation cannot be held to be
illegal.
Unless there