this amount was charged from respondent No. 2, promising him a complete Acupuncture treatment. This is factually incorrect and wrong.
9. The learned counsel ... also mentioned that the petitioner is not registered for practicing Acupuncture. It may be pertinent to mention that respondent No. 2 has also filed
dated
25/11/2003 prescribed that certain practices like
acupuncture and Hypnotherapy which qualified as modes
of therapy, could be allowed to be practised ... Ministry of Health and Family
Welfare which directed that certain practices such as
acupuncture and Hypnotherapy which were qualified as
modes of therapy, could
Shivraj Chhotulal Pataria And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra on 5 April, 2023
Author
Shivraj Chhotulal Pataria And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra on 5 April, 2023
Author
Shivraj Chhotulal Pataria vs The State Of Maharashtra on 5 April, 2023
Author: Bharati Dangre
Shivraj Chhotulal Pataria And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 5 April, 2023
Author: Bharati
Dr Shivraj Chhotulal Pataria And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra on 5 April, 2023
Neeta Shivraj Pataria vs State Of Maharashtra on 5 April, 2023
Author: Bharati Dangre
Bench
Dr. Shivraj Chootulal Pataria vs State Of Maharashtra on 5 April, 2023
Author: Bharati Dangre
Shivraj Chhotulal Pataria And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra on 5 April, 2023
Author
