Adalat Prasad vs Rooplal Jindal & Ors on 25 August, 2004
Equivalent citations: AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT ... Mathur
CASE NO.:
Appeal (crl.) 91 of 2002
PETITIONER:
Adalat Prasad
RESPONDENT:
Rooplal Jindal & Ors.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/08/2004
BENCH:
N. Santosh
Judge Bench of this Court in another case of Adalat Prasad vs.
Rooplal Jindal & Ors. (2004 (7) Scale 137). In the said case ... Adalat Prasad (supra), a 3-Judge Bench did not agree with the law
laid down by this Court in K.M.Mathew 's case
recent decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal and Ors. . The learned advocate has submitted that ... have carefully perused the said decisions. In the case of Adalat Prasad, the question which came up for consideration before the Supreme Court was whether
However, in the meantime, as the judgment in the case of Adalat Prasad came to be reported, the said application was not pressed ... recent decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal
approach this Court in view of the Supreme Court judgment in Adalat Prasad's case.
3. However, in my opinion, the petitioner ... recent decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal and Ors. . The learned Advocate has submitted that
recent decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal and Ors. III . The learned Advocate has submitted that ... have carefully perused the said decisions. In the case of Adalat Prasad, the question which came up for consideration before the Supreme Court was whether
Rooplal Jindal vs Adalat Prasad & Ors. on 6 December, 1999
Equivalent citations: 2000IAD(DELHI)994
Author: M.S.A. Siddiqui
Bench
recent decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal ... have carefully perused the said decisions. In the case of Adalat Prasad, the question which came up for consideration before the Supreme Court was whether
have and, thus, cannot exercise any inherent
jurisdiction.
11. In Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal [(2004) 7
SCC 338: 2004 SCC (Cri) 1927] a three ... upon the decision of the Hon'ble Apex
Court in Adalat Prasad vs Rooplal Jindal
and Others (Coram: 3 JJ)2, more particularly
Paragraph
have and, thus, cannot exercise any inherent
jurisdiction.
11. In Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal [(2004) 7
SCC 338: 2004 SCC (Cri) 1927] a three ... upon the decision of the Hon'ble Apex
Court in Adalat Prasad vs Rooplal Jindal
and Others (Coram: 3 JJ)2, more particularly
Paragraph
