Respondent No. 1 allotted an additional built up area
of 67,000 sq.mtrs against payment of additional premium of
Rs.984 crore. This resulted ... Respondent No. 1 allotted the additional built up area of 67,000
sq. meters against the payment of additional premium of Rs.984
crore. This
CIDCO would claim such additional charges as per its new
policy dated 9.5.2002. This policy envisaged collection of
additional premium from the lessee, who fails ... levying Addl. Lease Premium and, for
delay beyond six years, Addl. Lease Premium is levied.
The percentage of the amount of Additional Lease
Premium
therefore
submits that for this reason alone, an additional premium of Rs. 450/- was
paid to cover the risk of the passengers travelling ... jeep. By such
additional premium, respondent No. 3 owner has agreed that the appellant
would be liable to pay only
allotment of additional FSI, if considered by
the respondent-Corporation, that within
permissible regulations is permitted on
payment of additional lease premium in
accordance with ... allotment of additional FSI subject to
payment of additional lease premium in
accordance with the Land Disposal Regulations
and the Land Disposal Pricing Policy
submitted that in absence of any additional premium
being paid, the risk of the pillion rider was not covered.
::: Uploaded on - 30/01/2019 ::: Downloaded ... succumbed to the injuries. As per the policy at Exhibit 34,
additional premium has not been paid for covering the pillion rider and
only
supplementary lease deed deals with contractual
obligation about payment of lease premium for additional built up
area in installments, simple interest @ 10% upto due dates ... that -
(a) The Lessee shall pay 20% of the lease premium
for the additional built up area being the first
installment before the execution
relative of that person was travelling from the said jeep. No additional
premium was paid by respondent No.1 towards passengers and therefore, the
Tribunal
appellant are
concerned, the same relate to the aspects where no additional premium was
paid to cover the risk of the owner-insured. The clause
risk of a gratuitous passenger was not covered
and as no additional premium had been paid, the liability, if any,
was required to be satisfied
THIRD PARTY LIABILITY
In consideration of the payment of the additional premium of
Rs.250/-. It is hereby agreed and declared that notwithstanding
anything
