Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 566 (1.14 seconds)

Unpa vs State Of H.P on 11 March, 2016

administering of poison to the child on her body. It did not come in his investigation as to how poison was administered to the child ... poison and administer it to the child has not been explained by the prosecution. No person has seen the accused administering the poison
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sasikumar vs State Rep. By on 28 October, 2004

murder by poisoning, the prosecution must establish that the deceased died of the poison in question; that the accused had that poison in his possession ... accused to administer poison to the deceased; (2) the deceased died of poison stated to have been administered; (3) the accused had the poison
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Punjab vs Shehnaz And Others on 29 July, 2011

respondents finding the complainant (Fauzia) alone in her house had administered poison. The reason for administering poison was that a dispute had earlier occurred between ... that the complainant (Fauzia) has categorically stated that the respondents had administered poison to her. This fact, it is submitted, is also corroborated
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S S Saron - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next