Admissibility of a document is one thing and its
probative value, quite another: a document may be admissible
and yet may not carry any conviction ... according to them these documents do not
assist the case of the plaintiffs. There are other documents
whose genuineness and admissibility have been questioned
before
Indian Evidence Act, 1872
82. Presumption as to document admissible in England without proof of seal or signature.
When any document is produced before ... judicial or official character which he claims, and the document shall be admissible for the same purpose for which it would be admissible in England
marked 126 documents as exhibits with
the following directions:
"All the documents relied upon by the
plaintiffs in the list of documents from ... evidence:
Provided that where documents are filed and
the parties rely upon the documents, the proof
and admissibility of such documents which are
filed alongwith
mind about the admissibility
and determine judicially but the Presiding Officer failed to
look into the admissibility of the document for want of stamp
duty ... evidence and marking of
document. Marking of a document is only for convenient
reference, whereas, admitting document is taking the
document as evidence after applying
admissibility of evidence
should be taken when it is tendered and not
subsequently. The objections as to
admissibility of documents in evidence may be
classified ... insisting on formal proof
of a document, the document itself which is
sought to be proved being admissible in
evidence. In the first case, acquiescence
determine whether the document can be let in evidence and if it holds that the document is admissible and can be let in evidence there ... determined the question that the document does not require any stamp or is sufficiently stamped (sic) the document admissible in evidence, it should be deemed
respondent, on the other hand,
submitted that the admissibility and non-admissibility of document
or its relevancy need not be decided at the stage ... document, if marked as a document, does
not amount to admitting in documentary evidence. The difference
between marking of document and admitting a document
understanding that the Trial Court would
consider the admissibility and the relevancy of such
documents at the final hearing stage of the suit ... Trial Judge with an understanding that the admissibility
and the evidentiary value of the documents shall be looked
into and discussed at the final hearing
admissibility of evidence should be taken when it is
tendered and not subsequently. The objections as to
admissibility of documents in evidence may be
classified ... insisting on formal proof of a
document, the document itself which is sought to be
proved being admissible in evidence. In the first
case, acquiescence
admissibility of evidence should be taken when it is
tendered and not subsequently. The objections as to
admissibility of documents in evidence may be
classified ... insisting on formal proof of a
document, the document itself which is sought to be
proved being admissible in evidence. In the first
case, acquiescence
