contention of learned counsel for the appellant that the document
was admissible for collateral purpose, in our opinion, is not correct. In
Bondar Singh (supra ... document is sought to be brought in evidence are excluded, we
15
fail to see any reason as to how the document would be admissible
evidence:
Provided that where documents are filed and the
parties rely upon the documents, the proof and
admissibility of such documents which are filed
along
would not be correct to contend that although all the documents
collected during investigation form part of the final report
submitted by the Special Police ... them so as to make a distinction between the
documents which are in favour of the prosecution and those which
are in favour
R. Venkatakrishnan vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 7 August, 2009
Equivalent citations: AIR 2010
taken
into consideration. Even if a part is invalid, the
entire document need not be invalidated, only if it
forms a severable part. [See Bajrang ... consideration of the whole
will taken in connection with any evidence
properly admissible, and the meaning of the
will and of every part
reason of the aforementioned
provision the parties are free to produce original
documents and prove the same in accordance with
the terms of the rules ... evidence" relating to transaction evidenced by a
sale deed, its admissibility in evidence would be
beyond any question. We are not oblivious
documents which have been placed on file
are Ex.PW1/8, Ex.PW1/11 and Ex.PW1/12.
Perusal of said documents ... confirmed as UDC. Thus, above service benefits
as claimed shall not be admissible in favour of
plaintiff.
There is no merit in this contention
Roop Singh Negi vs Punjab National Bank & Ors on 19 December, 2008
Equivalent citations
Vinod Solanki vs Union Of India & Anr on 18 December, 2008
Equivalent citations: 2009
Satish And Ors vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 16 July, 2009
Equivalent
