admissibility of
evidence should be taken when it is tendered and
not subsequently. The objections as to admissibility
of documents in evidence may be classified ... evidence; and (ii) where the objection does not
dispute the admissibility of the document in
evidence but is directed towards the mode of proof
alleging
contention of learned counsel for the appellant that the document
was admissible for collateral purpose, in our opinion, is not correct. In
Bondar Singh (supra ... document is sought to be brought in evidence are excluded, we
15
fail to see any reason as to how the document would be admissible
document in evidence. It is
further held that the marking of certified copy per se does not make
the contents of such document admissible ... such documents, the court is not
bound to act upon the contents of those
documents unless persons connected with
such documents give evidence in court
requires the
following conditions to be fulfilled before a document is held to be
admissible thereunder : (i) it should be in the nature ... Supp. SCC 604], this
Court held:
"To render a document admissible under Section 35 , three
conditions must be satisfied, firstly, entry that is relied
Birad Mal Singhvi (supra), it was held :
"...To render a document admissible under
Section 35 , three conditions must be satisfied,
firstly, entry that ... document and at the same time raise a contention that the same is
inadmissible. The said report is, thus, admissible in evidence,
although
admissibility of evidence should be taken when it
is tendered and not subsequently. The objections as
to admissibility of documents in evidence may be
classified ... insisting on formal proof of a document, the
document itself which is sought to be proved being
admissible in evidence. In the first case,
acquiescence
only at his peril.
Objection as regards admissibility of a document, thus, specifically
required to be taken that it was not duly stamped. On such ... authority for the proposition that the party objecting to the
admissibility of the document must raise an objection so as to enable the trial
judge
Anand
Purohit [1988 Supp SCC 604]:
"To render a document admissible under Section
35 , three conditions must be satisfied, firstly, entry
that is relied
time of argument and passing the award with regard to the document or documents now marked as Exhibits, which may create a new fact ... According to the learned counsel, the question as to whether a document is admissible in evidence, or not, must have to be judged
Anand Purohit , it has clearly been held :-
" To render a document admissible under setlon 35. three conditions must be satisfied, firstly, entry that
