Group B category.
7. The DSSSB thereafter issued a corrigendum advertisement dated
16.09.2011 prescribing the upper age limit of 30 years and extended the last ... both age and educational qualifications was retained as
15.01.2010.
8. The corrigendum advertisement led to the second round of litigation.
This time, the challenge
aside. According to the learned counsel, the
advertisement dated 05.10.1998 and the corrigendum
dated 13.10.1998, if cumulatively read, are in
meticulous compliance of the directions ... Constitutional
Court did not only issue the advertisement dated
05.10.1998 with the corrigendum on 13.10.1998
without either determining or specifying the exact
location
nature of
certiorari quashing the Clause 4 (Ga) of the
advertisement dated 17th February 2016 issued by the
respondents for supplying the vacancies ... nature of
mandamus directing the respondents to issue the
advertisement / corrigendum of the advertisement dated
17th February 2016 for supplying 141 backlog vacancies
this Court towards the Clause No.
5 of the Advertisement and the subsequent corrigendum dated
28.03.2013 whereby, a proviso to Clause No.5 came ... supra) :-
"As stated above, the instructions in the
advertisement and corrigendum, both have to be
read together. Column 5 pertains to Educational
Qualification
2014 prayer made is for quashing the
advertisement dated 10.01.2014 read with the corrigendum dated 18.01.2014,
further seeking a direction to the respondents to fill ... advertisement dated 10.01.2014. It may be mentioned that following the
selection process pursuant to the advertisement dated 10.01.2014 as modified
by the corrigendum dated
candidates
as parties. The respondents have stated that while issuing revised
advertisement/corrigendum dated 30.11.2015, a provision was
inserted in Clause-7 of the said ... those candidates who did not apply in pursuance of the aforesaid
advertisement and corrigendum, knowing that they will not be
able to acquire the certificate
petitioner belongs, are lying
vacant in relation to advertised posts as per advertisement dated
23.09.2009.
20. There is one more aspect that would require ... which fulfilled the time frame requirement
stipulated in advertisement/corrigendum i.e. Backward Class
Certificate of the candidate to be within one year
candidates
as parties. The respondents have stated that while issuing revised
advertisement/corrigendum dated 30.11.2015, a provision was
inserted in Clause-7 of the said ... those candidates who did not apply in pursuance of the aforesaid
advertisement and corrigendum, knowing that they will not be
able to acquire the certificate
corrigendum has been issued on
24.12.2011 showing the enhancement of vacancies and then coming the
corrigendum dated 31.12.2012, but the copy of the corrigendum dated ... corrigendums, i.e., the corrigendum dated 24.12.2011 and 31.12.2012
as 67, 73 and 29 respectively.
11
We, after going through these three corrigendums, have
found
writ application is that
on 28.12.2015, respondent no. 1 issued an advertisement being
advertisement no. 14/2015 on the basis of certain requisition issued ... applicants for the Combined Graduate Level Competitive Examination for
which different advertisement/ corrigendum etc. had been published. From
perusal of para
