Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Article 19(1)(a) grants citizens the right to freely express their thoughts, opinions, and ideas. This includes the freedom to express oneself through speech

prevention of disorder of a grave nature, a disorder which the authorities thought was necessary to prevent in view of the emergent situation created ... power. If the order passed by him showed that he thought his powers were more extensive than they actually were, the order might fail

secure to all its citizens: JUSTICE, social, economic and political; LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship; EQUALITY of status and of opportunity

case, Gajendragadkar, C.J. thought it fit to give reasons for expressing full concurrence with that decision. 22. The only contention before the Court ... adopt the procedure prescribed by the proviso. 24. The learned Chief Justice thought that the power to amend in the context was a very wide

society and the diverse nature and character of our people, has thought it necessary to widen the sphere of s.32 to avoid injustice. [108G ... which appears to be too good to be true and an after thought added to strengthen the prosecution case; and (vi) If there is anything

adaptation for giving new vitality in keeping with the progress of thought in our times. All this, however, is not really novel, although ... zigzag, course of the landmark cases and the tangled web of judicial thought have perplexed one branch of Industrial Law, resulting from obfuscation

observed that, at one time, the institution of secretaries and treasurers was thought of as a suitable alternative to the managing agency system

Independent Thought vs Union Of India on 11 October, 2017 Equivalent citations: AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 4904, AIR 2018 SC (CRIMINAL) 229, (2017) 12 SCALE ... INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 382 OF 2013 Independent Thought .….Petitioner versus Union of India and Anr. ….Respondents JUDGMENT Madan B. Lokur

asseveration on the part of the petitioners is that freedom of thought and expression cannot be scuttled or abridged on the threat of criminal prosecution ... restrictions” are those which are meant to prevent the expression of a thought which is intrinsically dangerous to public interest and would not include anything

entertainment and not an art or a means of expression. Movie motivates thought and action and assures a high degree of attention and retention ... should have proximate and direct nexus with the expression. The expression of thought should be intrinsically dangerous to the public interests. In other words