Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 5189 (1.58 seconds)

State vs . 1. Manoj on 17 September, 2014

aged about 14 years) and implicated the accused in this false case. Learned Counsel further submitted that for the proof of age of the prosecutrix ... date of birth of prosecutrix is 05/07/1995, on simple arithmetical calculation, the age of prosecutrix comes to 14 years, 05 months
Delhi District Court Cites 47 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Munna on 21 November, 2014

accused and prosecutrix but not found. He collected the age proof of prosecutrix (name withheld) from BSM Senior Secondary School, Anandpur Dham, Karala, Delhi ... deposed falsely regarding the age of my daughter/ prosecutrix as 15½ years or that the age of my daughter/prosecutrix was about 18 years
Delhi District Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Mr. Rajan on 2 January, 2013

age proof of the prosecutrix at the time of admission. 18. PW4, Dr.Y.N.Maurya, has examined the prosecutrix aged 19 years ... age proof of the prosecutrix at the time of admission. 47. PW4, Dr.Y.N.Maurya, has examined the prosecutrix aged 19 years
Delhi District Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . 1. Manoj Kumar on 24 May, 2013

Mami Kajal. Learned Counsel for accused further submitted that no age proof of the prosecutrix is on the record only School Leaving Certificate is there ... 2009. 13. Learned Counsel for accused submitted that no age proof of the prosecutrix is on the record only School Leaving Certificate is there
Delhi District Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next