selection process initiated by advertisement
dated 13th April, 2018, by allowing age relaxation to them. Writ
petitions were instituted challenging the 2018 recruitment
process ... 2018]
benefit of age relaxation could not be permitted to such a second
chance.
14. It was argued furthermore that a number of candidates
whose
selection process initiated by advertisement
dated 13th April, 2018, by allowing age relaxation to them. Writ
petitions were instituted challenging the 2018 recruitment
process ... 2018]
benefit of age relaxation could not be permitted to such a second
chance.
14. It was argued furthermore that a number of candidates
whose
selection process initiated by advertisement
dated 13th April, 2018, by allowing age relaxation to them. Writ
petitions were instituted challenging the 2018 recruitment
process ... 2018]
benefit of age relaxation could not be permitted to such a second
chance.
14. It was argued furthermore that a number of candidates
whose
further respondents may kindly be directed to extent
the benefit of age relaxation of five years in terms of
Clause 10(1) of the advertisement ... upper age limit shall be admissible
across the board to SC/ST/OBC/SBC and women
candidates belonging to Rajasthan. The age relaxation
as provided
selection process initiated by advertisement
dated 13th April, 2018, by allowing age relaxation to them. Writ
petitions were instituted challenging the 2018 recruitment
process ... 2018]
benefit of age relaxation could not be permitted to such a second
chance.
14. It was argued furthermore that a number of candidates
whose
selection process initiated by advertisement
dated 13th April, 2018, by allowing age relaxation to them. Writ
petitions were instituted challenging the 2018 recruitment
process ... 2018]
benefit of age relaxation could not be permitted to such a second
chance.
14. It was argued furthermore that a number of candidates
whose
crossing the
maximum age limit has been snatched from them.
The respondents are under obligation to grant age
relaxation as granted by the State Government ... candidates became ineligible having crossed the
upper age limit prescribed in the rules but no age
relaxation has been given for admission in the Patwar
respondents, particularly the
corrigendum notification dated 8.7.2014, whereby the age
relaxation of 3 years given in the advertisement No.1/2013-14
dated ... relaxation.
26. It is also not in dispute that various service rules were
amended in 2008 and specific provisions for relaxation of age
were incorporated
age and petitioner being
employee of Panchayati Raj Department is to be treated
government employee and he is to be given age relaxation ... age on 01st January, 2005 but
in fact his eligibility was to be seen on 01st January, 1999 while
granting age relaxation as provided
selection process initiated by advertisement
dated 13th April, 2018, by allowing age relaxation to them. Writ
petitions were instituted challenging the 2018 recruitment
process ... 2018]
benefit of age relaxation could not be permitted to such a second
chance.
14. It was argued furthermore that a number of candidates
whose
