Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 495 (0.98 seconds)

I Venkatesan vs Ut Of Puducherry on 1 March, 2024

applicants who have been considered to be over-aged and are seeking age relaxation in terms of the notification and the relevant rules. 2. With ... dated 24.08.1983, where the upper age limit was 30 years and age relaxation of 5 years was given. Learned counsel for the applicant draws attention
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A Vinnarasi vs Ut Of Puducherry on 1 March, 2024

applicants who have been considered to be over-aged and are seeking age relaxation in terms of the notification and the relevant rules. 2. With ... dated 24.08.1983, where the upper age limit was 30 years and age relaxation of 5 years was given. Learned counsel for the applicant draws attention
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suganya K V vs Ut Of Lakshadweep on 1 March, 2024

applicants who have been considered to be over-aged and are seeking age relaxation in terms of the notification and the relevant rules. 2. With ... dated 24.08.1983, where the upper age limit was 30 years and age relaxation of 5 years was given. Learned counsel for the applicant draws attention
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Geetha K vs Ut Of Puducherry on 1 March, 2024

applicants who have been considered to be over-aged and are seeking age relaxation in terms of the notification and the relevant rules. 2. With ... dated 24.08.1983, where the upper age limit was 30 years and age relaxation of 5 years was given. Learned counsel for the applicant draws attention
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sindhuja M vs Ut Of Puducherry on 1 March, 2024

applicants who have been considered to be over-aged and are seeking age relaxation in terms of the notification and the relevant rules. 2. With ... dated 24.08.1983, where the upper age limit was 30 years and age relaxation of 5 years was given. Learned counsel for the applicant draws attention
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K Rajaram vs Ut Of Puducherry on 1 March, 2024

applicants who have been considered to be over-aged and are seeking age relaxation in terms of the notification and the relevant rules. 2. With ... dated 24.08.1983, where the upper age limit was 30 years and age relaxation of 5 years was given. Learned counsel for the applicant draws attention
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A Malini vs Ut Of Puducherry on 1 March, 2024

applicants who have been considered to be over-aged and are seeking age relaxation in terms of the notification and the relevant rules. 2. With ... dated 24.08.1983, where the upper age limit was 30 years and age relaxation of 5 years was given. Learned counsel for the applicant draws attention
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K Sujatha vs Ut Of Puducherry on 1 March, 2024

applicants who have been considered to be over-aged and are seeking age relaxation in terms of the notification and the relevant rules. 2. With ... dated 24.08.1983, where the upper age limit was 30 years and age relaxation of 5 years was given. Learned counsel for the applicant draws attention
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

U Subathra vs Ut Of Puducherry on 1 March, 2024

applicants who have been considered to be over-aged and are seeking age relaxation in terms of the notification and the relevant rules. 2. With ... dated 24.08.1983, where the upper age limit was 30 years and age relaxation of 5 years was given. Learned counsel for the applicant draws attention
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next