place in a sudden manner when
injuries were caused by rival parties. Aggressors were the complainant
party where Chhotelal was a member of the aggressor ... said
incident.
28. Thus, assailants became the complainant party, they were
the aggressors and the place of incident was in front of the house
place in a sudden manner when
injuries were caused by rival parties. Aggressors were the complainant
party where Chhotelal was a member of the aggressor ... said
incident.
28. Thus, assailants became the complainant party, they were
the aggressors and the place of incident was in front of the house
fulfilled, therefore, this Court is of the opinion
that Baburam was an aggressor and had attacked Ranveer, He needs to
be convicted under Section ... Court has
referred the issue of cross case, which party was the aggressor and has
recorded a finding that accused persons were aggressor causing injury
Himmat Singh in his statement had not
given the name of the aggressor. Similarly, witnesses Rakesh
and Surjan had also not given the names ... aggressor and
during investigation, no Test Identification Parade was carried
out for any accused. In para 10, he has admitted that while
recording dehati nalishi
report
(Ex.P/40) and admittedly complainant party were the aggressors who had
first hit members of the accused party on a trivial issue ... Heeralal. Thus, it is admitted that in fact complainant party
were the aggressors and they had gone to the house of Heeralal. This
witness denied
report
(Ex.P/40) and admittedly complainant party were the aggressors who had
first hit members of the accused party on a trivial issue ... Heeralal. Thus, it is admitted that in fact complainant party
were the aggressors and they had gone to the house of Heeralal. This
witness denied
prosecution
case. The prosecution also failed to demonstrate that the appellants were
aggressor. In that circumstances, the judgment of the Trial Court cannot be
upheld ... against injured witnesses. No inference can
be drawn that these witnesses were aggressor as stated by Katti (DW-1).
25. Vinod Kumar Shrivastava, Investigating Officer
Thus, it is submitted that in fact, complainant party was the
aggressor and in self defence, they had to resort to their safety and,
therefore ... three persons, it
cannot be said that the accused were the aggressors. High Court was
justified in holding that defence version was more probable than
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant Sajjanlal is
not an aggressor while infact it was deceased Anita Singh Thakur. As per
prosecution case ... Radheshyam (PW.1) after having said that Anita
Singh Thakur was an aggressor has deposed in Paragraph No.8 of this
testimony that Anita Singh
Referring to spot map, it is submitted that the appellants are not aggressors.
They were working at their shop and when Ishwar, under the influence ... could have been said that all the aggressors after forming a common
intention approached his house or work place to cause injury which was
homicidal
