pleaded
that the complainant party was at fault and were aggressors and caused
injuries to them, however, in self defence, Surat Singh gave a Jaily ... Sube Singh.
Therefore, learned counsel argued that the complainant party was the
aggressor and when they were causing injuries on the vital parts
appellant party caused the injuries in
self defence. The complainant party was aggressor in the present
case. Therefore, when the complainant armed with weapons were ... prosecution version. He contended that as the complainant party is
aggressor and caused injuries while entering into the house of
appellant, therefore, the appellant cannot
question to take forcible possession. Story was concocted.
Complainant party was the aggressor and had caused injuries on the person
of Begh Raj, Mahipal, Madan ... Begh Raj. In defence,
appellants had caused injuries. Complainant party was the aggressor. 13
injuries were noticed on the person of 4 appellants
injuries is not always a safe
criterion for determining who the aggressor was. It cannot
be stated as a universal rule that whenever the injuries ... have a chance to inflict severe and
mortal injury on the aggressor. In order to find whether the
right of private defence is available
party then Court is to see as to which party
was the aggressor. Whether there was a free fight. When number of
accused then whether ... caused then no question to opine as to
which party was the aggressor. In the present case, allegation of the
petitioner was that respondents-accused
further stated by them that the
complainant party was the aggressor and came to get possession of the
land qua which an interim injunction ... opinion, it was the
complainant side which was the aggressor in the instant case.
33. I may also state that the accused side says that
whole story was connected and fabricated because the
complainant party was the aggressor. The prosecution had collected
false evidence and circumstances against ... Revision No.2629 of 2004 [26]
party was the aggressor. Presence of the complainant, Gurraj Singh
and Jaspreet Kaur at the time of occurrence
specifically stated by the respondents-
accused that the complainant party was the aggressor party and the injuries
were caused to the complainant ... under :-
"25. Now the question arises as to which party was
aggressor. For the purpose of determining the point of
aggressor, explanation of complainant
statements. Otherwise,
as a matter of fact both these witnesses were the
aggressors. I had come afterwards. I am innocent."
Accused Krishan Gopal, when ... statements. Otherwise, as a
matter of fact both these witnesses were the aggressors.
I had to retaliate in my private defence and my co-
accused
initiated the fight and as to who was the aggressor. The
depositions of prosecution witnesses leave no ambiguity that the
respondents were the aggressor party ... certainty as to who initiated
the attack and who is the aggressor/trespasser, is correct. In these
circumstances, the trial Court has rightly extended
